安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






@| \_/ (), I'm not sure that 'more portalable surfaces = better puzzle' is true, but in this case I was aiming for a particular visual style, sorry about your expectations. Yep, I know about the competition, I doubt I have any chance of winning so it doesn't particularly matter. The 'glass' could be opaque on both sides to 'better' fulfil the requirements, but I like visibilty.
Is it good that the puzzle is average? Making it hard often means some people can't solve it, and too easy makes it boring.
@GBMusicMaser, thanks for playing.
more portalable surfaces = better buzzle
About the challenge: quaternary said it - a one-way-transperant glass is quite a cheap way to fulfill the competition rules.
And the puzzle - nothing much to say - a normal test, not very challenging, not too easy, nothing confuzing etc.
I agree with the comments below! Great looking map/puzzle. I hope the video was helpful in some way
@Innocentive, haha thanks.
I like the style a lot! And I'd say you built the slickest fizzler emitters in the entire Workshop.
I'd say medium for the difficulty (meduim-hard for the beginners)