安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






Historically, the correspondence between Timur and Bayezid was full of insults and threats, but also had a diplomatic dimension. In game, maybe there could be an event chain similar to how the Ottomans and Byzantium interact in Rise of the Turks. If the Ottomans choose to appease him, Timur would never march deep into Anatolia (or at least have a very low chance to), which then redirect their march towards china.
My suggestion to put him on rails might be to create a specific CB against members of the Ilkhanate. That way, he can advance that way far more easily and it might encourage his AI to do so. I might also make his arrival trigger an event that makes Ilkhanate vassals disloyal, as right now they are far more stable than they were IRL.