Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan






Historically, the correspondence between Timur and Bayezid was full of insults and threats, but also had a diplomatic dimension. In game, maybe there could be an event chain similar to how the Ottomans and Byzantium interact in Rise of the Turks. If the Ottomans choose to appease him, Timur would never march deep into Anatolia (or at least have a very low chance to), which then redirect their march towards china.
My suggestion to put him on rails might be to create a specific CB against members of the Ilkhanate. That way, he can advance that way far more easily and it might encourage his AI to do so. I might also make his arrival trigger an event that makes Ilkhanate vassals disloyal, as right now they are far more stable than they were IRL.