安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









Arcana has built-in support to add the new planets into the TrueSpace/RealSpace planetary classification system.
However, Arcana also adds a bunch of new types of Moons, which are not barren/empty like the vanilla moons. When used with RealSpace, this means that Arcana moons generate very frequently, at the same rate as vanilla/"barren" moons. This is contrary to the design philosophy of RealSpace which is to make habitable planets (or non-barren planets more generally) rare.
So, tldr, you can run the two mods together, but RealSpace's philosophy of an empty universe is not respected by Arcana's TrueSpace patch.
AGiantPie, are you sure that Arcana may be compatible with TrueSpace/RealSpace?
This is quote from the Arcana wiki "Arcana adds many new planets (...) Each of the planets can be found within the 5 new stars (...) ".
Salsa -> https://starboundarcana.miraheze.org/wiki/Planets
I am hoping that the worst case is that those worlds don't spawn at all. It wouldn't be a huge loss because they have nothing on them. They're almost like a more spooky version of a barren world.