安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
1. Dedicated ground based radar system, perhaps even able to be combined with the SAM system to boost its range (ex. AN/MPQ-53/65 Radar Set)
2. VTOL Jet for the new helicopter carrier (ex. Harrier, Jak-38, F-35B)
3. A true combat helicopter (ex. Apache, Hind, Tiger, Ka-52)
4. A ballistic missile launcher (ex. Topol-M)
5. Gun based AA system (ex. Gepard, Tunguska)
6. APC and/or IFV (ex. Puma, Bradley, BMP)
7. Multiple Launch Rocket System (ex. M270, TOS-1
Now comes the most important vehicle that I think is one that you should definitely implement:
The german Trilateraler Versuchsträger (TVT) "Panther", also known as the giraffe tank. Its an amazing concept that would be even more amazing in Stormworks.There is also other giraffe tanks (all of them german as well) that would work too. They are kind of similar after all.
Already built, J/A-109 https://psteamcommunity.yuanyoumao.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2761923315
4. A ballistic missile launcher (ex. Topol-M)
In testing phase
5. Gun based AA system (ex. Gepard, Tunguska)
currently being worked on
6. APC and/or IFV (ex. Puma, Bradley, BMP)
both APC and IFV are WIP
The rest sounds amazing. Also please make your amphibious bridge actually amphibious. Because at the moment, it ain't :/
Another thing I just remembered is a large transport plane that is able to carry the Artillery Truck and the tanks, something like the C-5 Galaxy (probably a bit smaller for performance reasons)
comrade
Its an asset for Amphibious Warfare use in getting Expeditionary Forces between a ship or one side of a river bank to another shore/river bank.
The description states that it is an amphibious vehicle. The name states that it is an amphibious vehicle. It is not an amphibious vehicle.
I have had a discussion about this already in the comments of the workshop page and although I get what you are trying to say, calling it an amphibious bridge although it isn't one is a little bit misleading and therefore a bit disappointing when you realize that its not.