安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
1. Dedicated ground based radar system, perhaps even able to be combined with the SAM system to boost its range (ex. AN/MPQ-53/65 Radar Set)
2. VTOL Jet for the new helicopter carrier (ex. Harrier, Jak-38, F-35B)
3. A true combat helicopter (ex. Apache, Hind, Tiger, Ka-52)
4. A ballistic missile launcher (ex. Topol-M)
5. Gun based AA system (ex. Gepard, Tunguska)
6. APC and/or IFV (ex. Puma, Bradley, BMP)
7. Multiple Launch Rocket System (ex. M270, TOS-1
Now comes the most important vehicle that I think is one that you should definitely implement:
The german Trilateraler Versuchsträger (TVT) "Panther", also known as the giraffe tank. Its an amazing concept that would be even more amazing in Stormworks.There is also other giraffe tanks (all of them german as well) that would work too. They are kind of similar after all.
Already built, J/A-109 https://psteamcommunity.yuanyoumao.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2761923315
4. A ballistic missile launcher (ex. Topol-M)
In testing phase
5. Gun based AA system (ex. Gepard, Tunguska)
currently being worked on
6. APC and/or IFV (ex. Puma, Bradley, BMP)
both APC and IFV are WIP
The rest sounds amazing. Also please make your amphibious bridge actually amphibious. Because at the moment, it ain't :/
Another thing I just remembered is a large transport plane that is able to carry the Artillery Truck and the tanks, something like the C-5 Galaxy (probably a bit smaller for performance reasons)
comrade
Its an asset for Amphibious Warfare use in getting Expeditionary Forces between a ship or one side of a river bank to another shore/river bank.
The description states that it is an amphibious vehicle. The name states that it is an amphibious vehicle. It is not an amphibious vehicle.
I have had a discussion about this already in the comments of the workshop page and although I get what you are trying to say, calling it an amphibious bridge although it isn't one is a little bit misleading and therefore a bit disappointing when you realize that its not.