Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere








Another intriguing aspect was the fact that we cannot see the underside of this table, which concerning implications: we cannot see the whole picture, we cannot truly know what issues were being discussed at this gianter table. There could be another world of table underneath gianter table, and I think this could be a potential setup for the much anticipated sequel, Giantest Table. Perhaps the creator intentionally made the point that political issues are far too complicated to understand at a cursory glance and that one must be wary of outside, unknown forces pushing their own political agenda.
Although I agree with this statement, I would like to inquire then what agenda you are attempting to push with this artful critque.