Installer Steam
log på
|
sprog
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (traditionelt kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tjekkisk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (græsk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (hollandsk)
Norsk
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasilien)
Română (rumænsk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et oversættelsesproblem








Another intriguing aspect was the fact that we cannot see the underside of this table, which concerning implications: we cannot see the whole picture, we cannot truly know what issues were being discussed at this gianter table. There could be another world of table underneath gianter table, and I think this could be a potential setup for the much anticipated sequel, Giantest Table. Perhaps the creator intentionally made the point that political issues are far too complicated to understand at a cursory glance and that one must be wary of outside, unknown forces pushing their own political agenda.
Although I agree with this statement, I would like to inquire then what agenda you are attempting to push with this artful critque.