Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem








Another intriguing aspect was the fact that we cannot see the underside of this table, which concerning implications: we cannot see the whole picture, we cannot truly know what issues were being discussed at this gianter table. There could be another world of table underneath gianter table, and I think this could be a potential setup for the much anticipated sequel, Giantest Table. Perhaps the creator intentionally made the point that political issues are far too complicated to understand at a cursory glance and that one must be wary of outside, unknown forces pushing their own political agenda.
Although I agree with this statement, I would like to inquire then what agenda you are attempting to push with this artful critque.