Train Simulator Classic

Train Simulator Classic

[pjt] Gently are the Goyles
9 条留言
Chippie 2019 年 6 月 13 日 下午 2:51 
Nope in 32 bit mode I get the dreaded 0xC0000005 ACCESS VIOLATION error, so its down to Dovetail, (again) It has only been common since 64bit escaped.
Chippie 2019 年 6 月 13 日 下午 2:44 
why does my train derail before the scenario loads properly? Is it 'cos I run Train Sim in 64bit mode?
Rammy 2016 年 7 月 7 日 上午 10:38 
That was a good Drive with nice amount of traffic. Thanks.
pjt1974  [作者] 2016 年 5 月 1 日 上午 4:12 
Thanks Ludmilla fan. Glad you enjoyed it
Ludmilla fan (NL) 2016 年 4 月 23 日 上午 11:46 
Thanks for a very nice scenario, I enjoyed driving it very much. Thanks for sharing it.
pjt1974  [作者] 2015 年 11 月 5 日 下午 1:03 
Thank rdp42. I'm glad you enjoyed it
rdp42 2015 年 11 月 4 日 上午 8:08 
This is an excellent scenario with very good AI and an interesting route. Many thanks for making.
pjt1974  [作者] 2015 年 5 月 31 日 上午 3:34 
Many thanks for the comment Snapper. Unfortunately, the passengers on platform is out of my hands, that's the route itself. As far ai services you've got to think logically to find some sort of realism on a double track. For example, Infront of an express, you're going to have a decent gap front and rear, one to allow him to run at line speed without catching anyone and a gap behind was created because he's faster than everyone else. A slow freight is the exact opposite, a good gap created behind so not many catch him before a passing loop, a good gap infront is created because everyone is quicker than him. How many local services would you see between Chester le Street and Darlington in 30 mins? It's a trade off unfortunately. Realism against interest.
snapper50 2015 年 5 月 31 日 上午 1:18 
Good scenario good amount of AI traffic out of Newcastle but needs more AI traffic on route also needs more passengers on platforms but still a good scenario. Thank you for sharing.