I mean if I do nothing, path by pixel distance passing bigger location is already naturally longer than smaller location, so I compensated it
in the contrary, path by counting location number (proximity) is reversed, because bigger location reduced proximity cost

That's what I'm saying

Currently the cost is decreasing as the size increases, so it's making it easier to move across big locations.

It should be the other way around for it to work as intended. Bigger size -> higher movement cost

It's WAD, bigger location actually cost more in moving, cuz the path is far from direct line.

The movement cost appears to be decreasing instead of increasing with the size

Can population capacity be changed instead by habitable area size? Location size and what's actually habitable in the location are different, though you'd need some research

撒哈拉沙漠的走廊中间的那些绿洲，面积在数据上显示很大

我印象中撒哈拉基本上都是走廊实际面积很小，你是说马里那边吗

撒哈拉沙漠的补给上限大得不像话，比布拉格还高

刷新

人口容量的修正是有时间限制的吗

那很厉害了，辛苦作者了
整个唯物史观的mod合集感觉都非常好，可惜p社本来应该把这种明显就合理的因素做进原版的

通过黑魔法（
是算的，原版面积加原版提供的一个很buggy的内核修正，然后反推纬度

比较好奇这个mod的真实面积的数值是怎么判断的。。。是作者一个一个设置的吗 还是说有什么算法能基于原版的地图直接逆向算出来真实面积

绝赞