订阅以下载
地块大小修正 / Location Size Factor

I mean if I do nothing, path by pixel distance passing bigger location is already naturally longer than smaller location, so I compensated it
in the contrary, path by counting location number (proximity) is reversed, because bigger location reduced proximity cost

That's what I'm saying

Currently the cost is decreasing as the size increases, so it's making it easier to move across big locations.

It should be the other way around for it to work as intended. Bigger size -> higher movement cost

It's WAD, bigger location actually cost more in moving, cuz the path is far from direct line.

The movement cost appears to be decreasing instead of increasing with the size

Can population capacity be changed instead by habitable area size? Location size and what's actually habitable in the location are different, though you'd need some research

撒哈拉沙漠的走廊中间的那些绿洲，面积在数据上显示很大

我印象中撒哈拉基本上都是走廊实际面积很小，你是说马里那边吗

撒哈拉沙漠的补给上限大得不像话，比布拉格还高

刷新

人口容量的修正是有时间限制的吗