安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






I spent half of yesterdays evening to fix it, thought i had it, gotta recheck all my maps :((
Also, with the reduction of overall size, as some already mentioned, the balance might be a lil off.
So, we have two choice here:
a) Leave it be so it doesnt change the way it looks (aka mudfight purism)
b) Do some small adjustments to increase balance. If we decide to go down that route, input for any balance problems would be welcome.
Maybe make the zones half the size be a good thing too.
Thanks for the work.
But i have few issues :
The side with 2 town is automatic win due to the town and the fact that opponent has pretty much no cover to hide from the atgm posted in the 2 town.
Also, the side with towns seems to have better roads.
leading to many cv lost and huge advantage for opponent
Solutions :
Maybe add some forest area or a vilage in the center of the map.
Same thing for the side near the river, its too open and one sided.
Good luck mate
But it still looks kinda fun so... :)
You're pumping maps out, I can't work that fast !