安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
My only suggestion is perhaps there should be a downside to the formation(otherwise, there's literally no reason to have it off unless youre moving from one part of the battlefield to the other, so you ALWAYS want it on in combat, pretty brainless), but I'm not sure what could be reasonably added. More vulnerability to flanking would make sense, but i don't think there's a way to do that. Maybe more vulnerability to missile fire because they're focusing their shields forward and not upwards? Maybe -5 attack instead of +5, because they can't consistently attack units who are out of position without risking opening up a vulnerability in the phalanx? Maybe reduce their anti-large bonus because the formation is aimed more at stopping infantry than huge monsters like dragons? Not sure.
That wouldn't really make any sense. Empire spearmen are their least experienced and weakest troops. Their spears just aren't as long, because they don't fight in an elven phalanx kind of way.
Empire lore tier is something like spearmen, spearmen with shields, swordsmen/halberds, greatswords.