安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
@ĐieḨard☠ I dont speak russian but I used google translate. There is no russian language support. Нет поддержки русского языка.
the trek one is very complicated
so peeps know
@omega13ful most of the systems are designed after their description on wookiepedia. So if a system has 9 planets it will have 9 planets in stellaris. Only thing I will reduce are the moons. Most gas giants in the star wars universe have like 30 moons and thats simply impossible in stellaris
In the Core particularly there are a lot of systems with a lot of planets.
Maybe reduce them to at most 3 planets to keep it from being too insane.
civilizations - including the player's empire - get renamed at start
locked-in custom empires don't spawn (rip empire vs rebels)
some systems are too close and have awkward hyperlane connections, and its hard to click one and not the other
Dromund Kaas is stuck with an irradiated debuff? I want to play as a sith empire assaulting the republic from DK towards a Republic Coruscant
still good ideas and its coming along