安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
@ĐieḨard☠ I dont speak russian but I used google translate. There is no russian language support. Нет поддержки русского языка.
the trek one is very complicated
so peeps know
@omega13ful most of the systems are designed after their description on wookiepedia. So if a system has 9 planets it will have 9 planets in stellaris. Only thing I will reduce are the moons. Most gas giants in the star wars universe have like 30 moons and thats simply impossible in stellaris
In the Core particularly there are a lot of systems with a lot of planets.
Maybe reduce them to at most 3 planets to keep it from being too insane.
civilizations - including the player's empire - get renamed at start
locked-in custom empires don't spawn (rip empire vs rebels)
some systems are too close and have awkward hyperlane connections, and its hard to click one and not the other
Dromund Kaas is stuck with an irradiated debuff? I want to play as a sith empire assaulting the republic from DK towards a Republic Coruscant
still good ideas and its coming along