安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









Hope this provides some help?
At present, once I try to implement a Mech Battalion within a combat group, I am limited to forming an Infantry Bat. or Tank Bat. and so forth. Consequently, when planning large-scale (more than battalion-level) campaigns, I must employ 5-10 decks for both side, which often leads to headaches and confusion.
Hope you lift the restrictions on Free Deck in future update, firstly, permit each troop type to own more than 20 cards rather than 10.
Then allow each battle group to have 6-8 companies or even more, and each company could have 6-8 platoons or even more, even allowing each platoon to use 4+ slots, so that the deck can reach its full potential.
What will happen? In this framework, we can fully establish a brigade-level combat group, complete with several battalion-level units, rather than merely the incomplete battalion-level formations under the Eugen framework.
However, I still wanna see some well-designed units from vanilla and CRM, like various M109 variants and air-launched cruise missiles.
And I found that S-400 combined with the Pantsir AA-array can effectively destroy virtually all aircraft. Might it be possible to extend the range of air-to-air missiles for modern fighters (i.e. F-16XM, F-35, Su-57, etc.)?