安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
奖励
Would prove for a good base against any hostile. But really bad for anything passive lol.
Doing so this way saves performance both in how it deals out damage, and that it will destroy your ship well before reaching the planets surface, Preventing voxel deformation.
It is absolutely amazing to find the kind of design decisions that go into rovers and ships supposed to work in that environment.
Either way, the script would look nicer if it did damage to the outermost blocks every 500ms, rather than deleting random chunks of a ship with such a large interval. You Would be able to see your armor crunching up under that pressure. Applying forces along the axis of gravity on the ship would be even more amazing. Guess you're not doing that, ever.
The camera being forced to spin actually sucks, it could be much more fun if there was some kind of sin(x,y) assigned to player velocity, that way it looks and feels like you're being blown about by the extreme winds.