Cài đặt Steam
Đăng nhập
|
Ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Trung giản thể)
繁體中文 (Trung phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bulgaria)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraina)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật








Pretty cool. Too many redacted and expunged things though. Also, it should probably be safe since putting it in a tough enough box would stop it from spreading.The cross-testing doesn't make too much sense either, since there is no reason for the foundation to do it. That's all I have to say.
there goes anything good about your scp
the scp was decent as well and you put it against something over rated like 682
thats exactly what youre not supposed to do with an scp for ♥♥♥♥ sakes.
Generic Doomsday Villain[tvtropes.org]: In a way, SCP-682 is purely a vehicle for SCP cross-test fun. Detractors of the article sees 682 as lacking any sort of personality beyond "they are disgusting", and is created purely so that people can propose SCP cross-tests to try to destroy it.
You know, Until they mentioned one of the overrated scps
at least theresn o 049 intervierw