Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan








Pretty cool. Too many redacted and expunged things though. Also, it should probably be safe since putting it in a tough enough box would stop it from spreading.The cross-testing doesn't make too much sense either, since there is no reason for the foundation to do it. That's all I have to say.
there goes anything good about your scp
the scp was decent as well and you put it against something over rated like 682
thats exactly what youre not supposed to do with an scp for ♥♥♥♥ sakes.
Generic Doomsday Villain[tvtropes.org]: In a way, SCP-682 is purely a vehicle for SCP cross-test fun. Detractors of the article sees 682 as lacking any sort of personality beyond "they are disgusting", and is created purely so that people can propose SCP cross-tests to try to destroy it.
You know, Until they mentioned one of the overrated scps
at least theresn o 049 intervierw