商店頁面
Garry's Mod
全部 討論區 螢幕擷圖 藝術作品 實況直播 影片 工作坊 新聞 指南 評論

Garry's Mod

商店頁面
Garry's Mod >  工作坊 > z0mbiesrock 的工作坊 > Watermelon Virus > 討論區
Watermelon Virus
介紹 討論區9 留言306 更新註記
 此主題已被置頂，因此它可能很重要
z0mbiesrock  [開發人員] 2017 年 7 月 5 日 下午 6:14
SCP-6738
SCP-6738

Item #: SCP-6738

Object Class: Keter

Special Containment Procedures: No direct physical contact may be made with SCP-6738 for any reason. Anyone making physical contact with SCP-6738 must be contained in quarantine immediately. SCP-6738 must be handled with nonliving macroscopic matter at all times. Any transportation of SCP-6738 must be done in a container capable of preventing its escape. Any and all subjects infected by SCP-6738 must be [DATA EXPUNGED] before SCP-6738 can mature and multiply.

Description: SCP-6738 appears to be a small watermelon only 0.3048 meters (1ft) in diameter. It is much harder than that of an ordinary watermelon, being able to remain in one piece even if shot at with a [REDACTED]. It is revealed to endure a limited amount of damage before collapsing, after which it breaks into multiple inert pieces. Attempts to damage SCP-6738 using environmental hazards such as height, radiation, or fire, have been met with [DATA EXPUNGED].

SCP-6738's true nature is revealed upon direct physical contact with a living, macroscopic, organic entity, such as a human, a bird, or another organic SCP besides itself. SCP-6738 infects a host by generating a burst of electrical sparks that act as a means of entry; no clothing or hazard suit can prevent this. Hosts infected with SCP-6738 slowly turn a greenish color, while humanoid hosts appear to [REDACTED], becoming shaped like a watermelon. After a brief incubation period, the host explodes into [DATA EXPUNGED] before materializing between two and five new instances of SCP-6738.

SCP-6738 lacks higher intelligence or even aggressive impulses, but has a volatile method of locomotion, as if an internal system was bouncing within SCP-6738, being the source of its unpredictable movement. Dr. ████████████ conducted research on SCP-6738's inorganic movement compared to its organic life cycle, but was terminated after a [DATA EXPUNGED].

SCP-6738 interacts differently with various SCPs, and Dr. ███████ is responsible for recording each interaction SCP-6738 has with them. Dr. ███████ was fortunate to survive over [REDACTED] observed encounters between SCP-6738 and another SCP. Notable interactions exhibited by SCP-6738 and [REDACTED] include but are not limited to:
  • SCP-6738 appears to provoke SCP-173 without a suitable reason, causing SCP-173 to bounce SCP-6738 everywhere within its container. SCP-6738 can not infect SCP-173.
  • SCP-6738 can infect SCP-106. However, SCP-106 cannot die from the infection, but will still burst melons from himself, only to be reinfected once more. Instances of SCP-6738 spawned from SCP-106 exhibit [DATA EXPUNGED] before disintegrating.
  • SCP-6738 was once used as a means of terminating SCP-682 on ██-██-████. However, SCP-682 [DATA EXPUNGED], apparently controlling the melons that spawned from its [REDACTED] to "melon-ify" enough biomass to reform its true self. SCP-682-controlled instances of SCP-6738 were retrieved before [DATA EXPUNGED], as well as [DATA EXPUNGED] anyone infected. After reforming, all traces of SCP-6738 were removed from its body.

Due to [DATA EXPUNGED], SCP-6738 shows immunity to the effects of SCP-409, as if the volatility of both SCPs cancel each other out. More research is needed.

In case of a SCP-6738 outbreak, infested facilities are to be thoroughly bombed, as explosives appear to be a weakness to SCP-6738. However, if an explosion leaves a few surviving instances of SCP-6738, it can be launched at new hosts without [REDACTED].
最後修改者：z0mbiesrock; 2017 年 7 月 6 日 下午 5:38
< >
目前顯示第 1-15 則留言，共 38 則
iris astrum real 2017 年 7 月 5 日 下午 8:07 
sick
#1
Deffy 2017 年 7 月 6 日 上午 12:33 
I know it's kind of dumb but I wanna give a really simple review.
Pretty cool. Too many redacted and expunged things though. Also, it should probably be safe since putting it in a tough enough box would stop it from spreading.The cross-testing doesn't make too much sense either, since there is no reason for the foundation to do it. That's all I have to say.
最後修改者：Deffy; 2017 年 7 月 6 日 上午 12:42
#2
Saul Goodman 2017 年 7 月 6 日 上午 4:43 
Wow so much time and effort! +Rep
#3
Vergil 2017 年 7 月 6 日 上午 5:53 
I'ts SCP-4016 from gm_site19 map
#4
Monsota 2017 年 7 月 6 日 上午 7:31 
I was testing it, and it isn't immune to fire. It can be killed by explosions or fire, and hosts need to be killed. Using a form of a Gibmod, I found the head bursts into 2-5 watermelons.
#5
Omegagoji Rex-17 2017 年 7 月 6 日 上午 10:11 
I wonder how it'll work against 682
#6
Triggered_Atheist 2017 年 7 月 6 日 上午 10:42 
Oh, this is just too good.
#7
76561198286801699 2017 年 7 月 6 日 下午 12:13 
> putting scps near over rated scps such as 682



there goes anything good about your scp

the scp was decent as well and you put it against something over rated like 682

thats exactly what youre not supposed to do with an scp for ♥♥♥♥ sakes.

最後修改者：76561198286801699; 2017 年 7 月 6 日 下午 12:14
#8
Boeloe 2017 年 7 月 6 日 下午 12:22 
Which one's SCP 628 again?
#9
76561198286801699 2017 年 7 月 6 日 下午 12:23 
引用自 Xcalivyr：
Which one's SCP 628 again?
That gay reptile thats practically a sue
#10
z0mbiesrock  [開發人員] 2017 年 7 月 6 日 下午 4:11 
It's a keter because it has unusual interactions between other SCPs, which could make situtations much worse.
#11
76561198286801699 2017 年 7 月 6 日 下午 4:19 
引用自 z0mbiesrock：
It's a keter because it has unusual interactions between other SCPs, which could make situtations much worse.
other scps? naw ♥♥♥♥♥, we only use OVERRATED SCPS
#12
Stimuliger 2017 年 7 月 6 日 下午 4:44 
Whoever made this either is very creative or has way too much time on their hands.
#13
z0mbiesrock  [開發人員] 2017 年 7 月 6 日 下午 5:40 
引用自 DefiantDeer13th：
I know it's kind of dumb but I wanna give a really simple review.
Pretty cool. Too many redacted and expunged things though. Also, it should probably be safe since putting it in a tough enough box would stop it from spreading.The cross-testing doesn't make too much sense either, since there is no reason for the foundation to do it. That's all I have to say.


引用自 Vaping Vent Shark：
引用自 z0mbiesrock：
It's a keter because it has unusual interactions between other SCPs, which could make situtations much worse.
other scps? naw ♥♥♥♥♥, we only use OVERRATED SCPS

Generic Doomsday Villain[tvtropes.org]: In a way, SCP-682 is purely a vehicle for SCP cross-test fun. Detractors of the article sees 682 as lacking any sort of personality beyond "they are disgusting", and is created purely so that people can propose SCP cross-tests to try to destroy it.
#14
76561198286801699 2017 年 7 月 6 日 下午 5:40 
引用自 Toxic：
Whoever made this either is very creative or has way too much time on their hands.
They made it so well as well!
You know, Until they mentioned one of the overrated scps
at least theresn o 049 intervierw
#15
< >
目前顯示第 1-15 則留言，共 38 則
每頁顯示： 1530 50