商店页面
Starbound
全部 讨论 截图 艺术作品 实况直播 视频 创意工坊 新闻 指南 评测

Starbound

商店页面
Starbound >  创意工坊 > Azure Fang 的创意工坊 > More Tillable Blocks: Dirts and Sands > 讨论
More Tillable Blocks: Dirts and Sands
描述 讨论1 留言32 改动说明
lophatkao 2016 年 9 月 11 日 下午 11:04
Gardenbot2 patch
note this wont do anything at moment, but will work after next gb update

i recommend a seperate compatibility patch, as you need to modify mod priority

location (example)
/Starbound/mods/<patch mod name>/gardenbot2.config.patch
note lowercase G


{ "op":"add", "path":"/tillableList/-", "value":"sand2" }, // watch your commas o.o
{ "op":"add", "path":"/tillableList/-", "value":"another_material" }


after you create your _metadata file, open it and add lines:

"priority" : 4
"includes" : ["GardenBot2"]

to make sure it loads after gardenbot, so the patch has a file to actually patch
gardenbot loads after most other mods so its patch files can do their patches

you could modify priority of main mod and just have patch included with it.. i dont forsee your material patches conflicting with anything...
but as a seperate patch mod, i could add it to my gardenbot + patches collection

i freaking hate steams formatting - it sucks -.-
wont let me use [ code ] tags properly
最后由 lophatkao 编辑于; 2016 年 9 月 11 日 下午 11:11
< >
正在显示第 1 - 4 条，共 4 条留言
Azure Fang  [开发者] 2016 年 9 月 12 日 上午 3:01 
I swap out [ for ( in the codeblock and annotate it when posting on Steam for that reason :P

Thanks. I know how to patch JSON, and I figured I'd unpack GB2 after the update to look directly at the new implementation, but this helps. I don't think the priority will be necessary as SB seems to properly auto-prioritize patches after assets, but I'll experiment as necessary.

And thanks again for the upcoming change!
#1
lophatkao 2016 年 9 月 12 日 上午 7:01 
no the priority is necessary, just having the includes/requires would change gardenbot's priority (silly loader)

also why the ore patch for FU never worked :/

sorry about post tone, ive had to lower my expectations of what people know how to do since release - trying to get some people to even find their starbound.log is ... difficult ;)
i see starbound isnt your first modding rodeo... so i'll try not to make same mistake hehe
#2
lophatkao 2016 年 9 月 12 日 上午 7:10 
changes: (yes this is all of it ;) )
in botspawner.lua - OnInteraction()

parameters.tillableList = root.assetJson("/gardenbot2.config:tillableList")

in tillState.lua - findPosition()

local isTillable = function(mname)
if type(mname) ~= "string" then return end
self.tillables = self.tillables or config.getParameter("tillableList",{})
for _,k in ipairs(self.tillables) do
if k == mname then return true end
end
return (string.find(mname,"dirt") or mname == "mud" or mname == "clay")
end


edit: doh just figured out this only affects newly spawned bots, not relocated ones... oh well
edit2: hrm actually i think i may redo when it loads list - as is, the tillable list would be forever locked to whatever is set when they are first spawned
最后由 lophatkao 编辑于; 2016 年 9 月 12 日 上午 7:15
#3
Azure Fang  [开发者] 2016 年 9 月 12 日 上午 7:29 
引用自 lophatkao：
no the priority is necessary, just having the includes/requires would change gardenbot's priority (silly loader)

also why the ore patch for FU never worked :/

sorry about post tone, ive had to lower my expectations of what people know how to do since release - trying to get some people to even find their starbound.log is ... difficult ;)
i see starbound isnt your first modding rodeo... so i'll try not to make same mistake hehe
I understand (post tone). You weren't being condesending(sp?) and were trying to help, which I can fully respect. And with the number of modders I have helped (read as: written their code) at this point, I understand the feeling.

I understand (priority). I'll have to look into that. I use a small, unreleased, personal patch set that I've never had to set a priority for, so I assumed it was logically prioritizing. Setting an arbitrarily high (2 to the 10th high enough? :squirtyay:) should be effective and prevent theoretical third-party patch conflict, correct?



引用自 lophatkao：
changes: (yes this is all of it ;) )
in botspawner.lua - OnInteraction()

parameters.tillableList = root.assetJson("/gardenbot2.config:tillableList")

in tillState.lua - findPosition()

local isTillable = function(mname)
if type(mname) ~= "string" then return end
self.tillables = self.tillables or config.getParameter("tillableList",{})
for _,k in ipairs(self.tillables) do
if k == mname then return true end
end
return (string.find(mname,"dirt") or mname == "mud" or mname == "clay")
end


edit: doh just figured out this only affects newly spawned bots, not relocated ones... oh well
edit2: hrm actually i think i may redo when it loads list - as is, the tillable list would be forever locked to whatever is set when they are first spawned
I don't understand Lua... but I understood this... What is this game doing to me?!
#4
< >
正在显示第 1 - 4 条，共 4 条留言
每页显示数： 1530 50