安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
So like I think this is already somewhat integrated in vanilla SE. For example, AFAIK, the Earthlike planet doesn't have any Uranium at all, one of the moons (Europa?-like) doesn't have hardly any stone, just lots and lots of ice (lots of hydrogen~), and none of the moons have gas (no atmospheric thrusters; O2 on the moon-moon is hard to come by; etc.).
As per ratios, the only way that could really be accomplished would be by creating new recipes and new ore types, "rich uranium", "sparse uranium" etc.
I think the vanilla way of doing it (simply not having certain types on some planets, with others literally in infinite abundance) basically accomplishes this goal. Though your method would be a much more realistic implementation of it, assuming the game designers don't simply automate dense/sparse ores into their engine in code, it would require dozens of hours of alterations and testing.
As I already have had a hard time updating my mod to ore-focused updates (i.e. as for the last survival overhaul, I still have about 20% of the ores that need re-tinkered with), were I to add 3x as many ores, I'd probably not be able to keep up. Plus it wouldn't work on custom planets.
That said, there are actually a lot of unique engineering challenges already built into the different planets/moons.