Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden
So like I think this is already somewhat integrated in vanilla SE. For example, AFAIK, the Earthlike planet doesn't have any Uranium at all, one of the moons (Europa?-like) doesn't have hardly any stone, just lots and lots of ice (lots of hydrogen~), and none of the moons have gas (no atmospheric thrusters; O2 on the moon-moon is hard to come by; etc.).
As per ratios, the only way that could really be accomplished would be by creating new recipes and new ore types, "rich uranium", "sparse uranium" etc.
I think the vanilla way of doing it (simply not having certain types on some planets, with others literally in infinite abundance) basically accomplishes this goal. Though your method would be a much more realistic implementation of it, assuming the game designers don't simply automate dense/sparse ores into their engine in code, it would require dozens of hours of alterations and testing.
As I already have had a hard time updating my mod to ore-focused updates (i.e. as for the last survival overhaul, I still have about 20% of the ores that need re-tinkered with), were I to add 3x as many ores, I'd probably not be able to keep up. Plus it wouldn't work on custom planets.
That said, there are actually a lot of unique engineering challenges already built into the different planets/moons.