Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
So like I think this is already somewhat integrated in vanilla SE. For example, AFAIK, the Earthlike planet doesn't have any Uranium at all, one of the moons (Europa?-like) doesn't have hardly any stone, just lots and lots of ice (lots of hydrogen~), and none of the moons have gas (no atmospheric thrusters; O2 on the moon-moon is hard to come by; etc.).
As per ratios, the only way that could really be accomplished would be by creating new recipes and new ore types, "rich uranium", "sparse uranium" etc.
I think the vanilla way of doing it (simply not having certain types on some planets, with others literally in infinite abundance) basically accomplishes this goal. Though your method would be a much more realistic implementation of it, assuming the game designers don't simply automate dense/sparse ores into their engine in code, it would require dozens of hours of alterations and testing.
As I already have had a hard time updating my mod to ore-focused updates (i.e. as for the last survival overhaul, I still have about 20% of the ores that need re-tinkered with), were I to add 3x as many ores, I'd probably not be able to keep up. Plus it wouldn't work on custom planets.
That said, there are actually a lot of unique engineering challenges already built into the different planets/moons.