安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题








Regarding breach-loaded ATGMs, which ones are you referring to?
Quick answer: No.
Detailed answer:
We've discussed this with the team, but the only solution would be to create a national INF-TNK-MECH-MOT-SUPP-AIR deck. This would be tedious and would render the divisional decks useless, requiring a complete rebalancing of their cost/availability and pricing.
This is why we're sticking with the divisional system.
- We need a model compatible with the game
- We are adding prototypes that correspond to divisional needs
- I don't see any point in adding the T-10 since Eugene will be adding it in the base game
- M-103 and 279, being heavy tanks from the 1960s, will really not be effective; we might consider it for reserve units.
But I already have a list of prototypes that will appear in the future.