can you do an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer for example USS John Paul Jones (DDG-53)

Yeah I've noticed many of the creators redirect us to stuff if we suggest it and I had that happen with a suggestion of a Hydrofoil Torpedo Boat, a LCVP Suggestion, and kinda ignored the Landing Ship suggestion which are things that would come in really handy. Also, we need something like the B-55 Crusader / Reporter.

引用自 Mallorcagps：

can you do an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer for example USS John Paul Jones (DDG-53)

No.

引用自 Oh no look who：

引用自 Mallorcagps：

can you do an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer for example USS John Paul Jones (DDG-53)

No.

How about a true battleship rather than the NQAF's existing Hood?
Or a flying command centre?

引用自 The Emerald Men Official：

引用自 Oh no look who：

No.

How about a true battleship rather than the NQAF's existing Hood?
Or a flying command centre?

we aren't going to build a battleship.

引用自 Oh no look who：

引用自 The Emerald Men Official：

How about a true battleship rather than the NQAF's existing Hood?
Or a flying command centre?

we aren't going to build a battleship.

Battleships Are WAY Too Large, I suggest you ask different builders for Vintage Vehicles.

引用自 dannytheburritoman：

引用自 Oh no look who：

we aren't going to build a battleship.

Battleships Are WAY Too Large, I suggest you ask different builders for Vintage Vehicles.

Correct, we strive for assets that can be atleast playable at Low Physics (Preferably High) whilst also having the bare minimum interior spaces that are highly detailed to make a creation feel real.

A Battleship can't achieve any of that, since it wouldn't be playable at Low Physics even without an interior.

引用自 Oh no look who：

引用自 dannytheburritoman：

Battleships Are WAY Too Large, I suggest you ask different builders for Vintage Vehicles.

Correct, we strive for assets that can be atleast playable at Low Physics (Preferably High) whilst also having the bare minimum interior spaces that are highly detailed to make a creation feel real.

A Battleship can't achieve any of that, since it wouldn't be playable at Low Physics even without an interior.

That is the exact problem, while one sounds like an amazing idea, games, unlike reality, have lag, and it can end your gameplay because it is so laggy. Also, with the new update, if something no-clips through walls it can crash your game. My Avro Shackleton model had multiple problems relevant to no-clipping and crashed my game repetatively.

Massive Explosions also can end your game quickly too. Which all the ammo detonating would delete your computer.

A CIWS anti air gun

引用自 Hepps：

A CIWS anti air gun

More like the beaver how about.

A carrier based variable wing heavy fighter like the F-14 or a fighter-bomber like the F-111 could be interesting. Additionally, some form of radiation weapon/dirty bomb could be pretty cool, if a bit finnicky with how fuel rods are

引用自 dannytheburritoman：

引用自 Hepps：

A CIWS anti air gun

More like the beaver how about.

would still be cool as ♥♥♥♥

引用自 Hepps：

引用自 dannytheburritoman：

More like the beaver how about.

would still be cool as ♥♥♥♥

Yes

A coast guard S&R sea plane which can be used to pick up downed pilots or sailors. Maybe it could look like a catalina flying boator grumman g111 albatross??