Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский — Испания)
Español - Latinoamérica (испанский — Латинская Америка)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский — Португалия)
Português-Brasil (португальский — Бразилия)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
As an added bonus, maybe there could even be an option to name blocks based on their position. "Front/Left Thruster", for example.
However, I'd just have a secondary checkbox, "zero-pad numbers", rather than a selector for number of digits. If someone had, say, 200 thrusters, I don't really see why *anyone* would want to number those 01-99, then 100-200, rather than just 001-200. So if the numbers are zero-padded at all, they should be padded based on the count of modules selected (this is also how Whip's renaming script works). Frankly, it's also easier from a user perspective, since you don't have to go check how many you have and think about how many digits that needs to be (though, to be fair, the answer is very rarely more than 3 digits).
On the plus side, you can do batch jobs, make a bunch of different rename groups and then execute the script to handle all of them. But it's not quite as simple as selecting the blocks, typing in the new name, and hitting "rename".