Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
As an added bonus, maybe there could even be an option to name blocks based on their position. "Front/Left Thruster", for example.
However, I'd just have a secondary checkbox, "zero-pad numbers", rather than a selector for number of digits. If someone had, say, 200 thrusters, I don't really see why *anyone* would want to number those 01-99, then 100-200, rather than just 001-200. So if the numbers are zero-padded at all, they should be padded based on the count of modules selected (this is also how Whip's renaming script works). Frankly, it's also easier from a user perspective, since you don't have to go check how many you have and think about how many digits that needs to be (though, to be fair, the answer is very rarely more than 3 digits).
On the plus side, you can do batch jobs, make a bunch of different rename groups and then execute the script to handle all of them. But it's not quite as simple as selecting the blocks, typing in the new name, and hitting "rename".