Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
As an added bonus, maybe there could even be an option to name blocks based on their position. "Front/Left Thruster", for example.
However, I'd just have a secondary checkbox, "zero-pad numbers", rather than a selector for number of digits. If someone had, say, 200 thrusters, I don't really see why *anyone* would want to number those 01-99, then 100-200, rather than just 001-200. So if the numbers are zero-padded at all, they should be padded based on the count of modules selected (this is also how Whip's renaming script works). Frankly, it's also easier from a user perspective, since you don't have to go check how many you have and think about how many digits that needs to be (though, to be fair, the answer is very rarely more than 3 digits).
On the plus side, you can do batch jobs, make a bunch of different rename groups and then execute the script to handle all of them. But it's not quite as simple as selecting the blocks, typing in the new name, and hitting "rename".