安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
I have tried 3-4 playthroughs (I am playing Gov vs Reb) with different mods and once I reached War Level 5+, good money/HR income, the push for capturing outposts and defense at the same time becomes impossible to me.
I tried 2 things:
With the way it is right now, how do you possibly manage to hold/gain any more outposts after you are at Warlevel 5-10?
A lot of the issues that come up in playing SP can be, for the most part, fixed by hosting the scenario as a LAN game through your client's multiplayer menu. This has been recommended by the playerbase for a very long time as SP doesn't like dealing with respawning etc.
Hosting as a server will NOT make you lose your save and even lets you continue it.
Hosting as a LAN server will NOT make it viewable/joinable to anyone in the game.
With all that said, we definitely don't want to alienate our considerable SP playerbase and have several rebalancing plans in place to make it work better in the future.
The SP vs MP balance is generally off, because the player count makes a tiny difference compared to the war level. The difficulty adjustments typically use a factor of war level + (players/5).
Thanks for the reply, this was very helpful. I guess I can go ahead and assume that I've been playing the wrong mode, I will try an RHS Altis SP scenario once the bugs are fixed in 2.1.1.