Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
I have tried 3-4 playthroughs (I am playing Gov vs Reb) with different mods and once I reached War Level 5+, good money/HR income, the push for capturing outposts and defense at the same time becomes impossible to me.
I tried 2 things:
With the way it is right now, how do you possibly manage to hold/gain any more outposts after you are at Warlevel 5-10?
A lot of the issues that come up in playing SP can be, for the most part, fixed by hosting the scenario as a LAN game through your client's multiplayer menu. This has been recommended by the playerbase for a very long time as SP doesn't like dealing with respawning etc.
Hosting as a server will NOT make you lose your save and even lets you continue it.
Hosting as a LAN server will NOT make it viewable/joinable to anyone in the game.
With all that said, we definitely don't want to alienate our considerable SP playerbase and have several rebalancing plans in place to make it work better in the future.
The SP vs MP balance is generally off, because the player count makes a tiny difference compared to the war level. The difficulty adjustments typically use a factor of war level + (players/5).
Thanks for the reply, this was very helpful. I guess I can go ahead and assume that I've been playing the wrong mode, I will try an RHS Altis SP scenario once the bugs are fixed in 2.1.1.