安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题








I wanted to play the wetlands map but decided against it because my poor people had to walk for miles and miles to get to the very few twigs and flint resources on this map. Is it possible to change it so there are more resources closer to the place your villagers spawn? It would be such an awesome place to build a nice village.
Another thing, there are no Tanin trees on the wetlands map!
1) The wetlands starting point is really close to the edge of the world, it's almost in a corner. Moving it a few islands towards the middle would reduce the chance people run into the edge early.
2) The Big River map is very short on metal deposits. there are none near the starting area and one must walk really far to find any. One option would be to add a mountain range somewhere across the river just past the flat open area.
It spoils what would have been for me a great scenario.
Also wondering if it would be possible to keep the animal attacks happening even into the iron age. For me they added some spice to the game.