边缘世界 RimWorld

边缘世界 RimWorld

1,097 个评价
Intimacy - A Lovin' Expansion
22
20
3
3
7
5
8
4
6
6
3
5
2
2
2
   
奖励
收藏
已收藏
取消收藏
Mod, 1.5, 1.6
内容描述词: 常见成人内容, 一些裸露画面或色情内容, 频繁的裸露画面或色情内容
文件大小
发表于
更新日期
843.655 KB
6 月 13 日 下午 12:06
10 月 5 日 下午 11:53
50 项改动说明 ( 查看 )
您需要 DLC 才能使用该物品。

订阅以下载
Intimacy - A Lovin' Expansion

在 turkler 的 1 个合集中
Lustrous mods
5 件物品
描述


[discord.gg]

I've always wanted a tasteful expansion of the more intimate mechanics in Rimworld. There are those mods, of course, but they always felt too crass, too explicit.

And so, I present to you, a tasteful expansion of intimacy mechanics!



An overview of the content added by this mod





This specific interaction can be toggled in the mod's settings.







Mod compatibility


Most mods should work perfectly fine with most mods out of the box. Compatibility patches for many mods, from Way Better Romance to ReSplice: Charmweavers and Nals' Facial Animation, are built into the mod!

Developers that want to patch their mods to work with mine should be delighted to know that this mod was developed with exactly that in mind. All significant checks use common helper functions and modders can easily Harmony patch onto those functions. Modders can even easily override things like how often seduction attemps happen and how likely other pawns are to accept seduction attempts.

Please see the discussions page for a full list of mods that are patched to work with Intimacy. There's too many to list here!

Official Expansions
If you like Intimacy, you might also be interested in its official submods!



Changelogs
Keep in mind that only major additions and changes get their own infographic here. For an extensive list of all changes, see the changelogs page.


Reworked the ideology precepts around physical love:
  • Free/Free and approved - The same as vanilla.
  • Partner only if commited - Pawns will engage in casual lovin' if they don't have a spouse/fiance/lover. If they are in a relationship, they will only do lovin' with their spouse/fiance/lover.
  • Polycules only - Similar to spouse only, but pawns that share lovers are allowed to do lovin' as well. This allows for 'play' between members of a harem.
  • Partner only - Pawns will only do lovin' with their spouse/fiance/lover.
  • Spouse only - Pawns will only do lovin' with their spouse.


This is dynamic, too! You won't see the option to set a pregnancy policy for couplings that would never do lovin'.

Future plans
I currently have one sub-mod planned.
  • One will add simple contraceptives to prevent pregnancies. I did not include these in the base mod as I thought they were kinda bloat.
These sub-mods will be completely optional.

Q&A
What's different, compared to similar mods?
This mod...
  • Is a lot more tasteful.
  • Is not explicit.
  • Is relatively lightweight.
Does this mod support 1.5 and 1.6?
No, there will be no support provided for 1.5 users. The mod, however, did work in 1.5 at some point and I saw no reason to break saves, so I left the 1.5 version in. Play with it at your own risk.

I found an issue, what should I do?
Report them in my Discord server.
[discord.gg]
Any reports in the comments, especially really vague ones, will be deleted with no response.

Is this mod compatible with [X mod]?
Intimacy is considered compatible with all mods until an incompatibility is reported, in which case the incompatibility will be logged in the Compatibility Matters thread.
Questions of this sort will be deleted with no response. Don't ask, go test it yourself.

Credits
My OC in the thumbnail, Euterpe, was illustrated by Kiansy.

Crewsayter, for buying me the Anomaly DLC.
热门讨论 查看全部(4)
30
1
10 月 19 日 上午 11:02
置顶: Compatibility matters
turkler
2
10 月 9 日 下午 10:53
How Intimacy Deals with "Cheating"
NinjaBeest
2
10 月 6 日 上午 2:17
Animation suggestion
Luneyl
747 条留言
Aristarchus of Samos 2 小时以前 
Lol. Ok man. I mean, I explained what my experience with the precept is, and why I believe vanilla is functionally different from what your mod does. It you who is looking at ambiguous text descriptions and reading in what you want to see there.

Also, calling me "functionally illiterate" and having "no reading comprehension" and then say it's not an insult... classy.
Satoshi Kun 4 小时以前 
Ignoring people who can't read--the mod description says that intimacy goes up on 'any positive social interaction', does that apply to modded interactions? I have the mod 'Positive Connections' and I have largely been suffering from intimacy starved colonists, I'm starting to wonder if that's the reason why, since it adds a bunch of random socialization.
turkler  [作者] 10 小时以前 
that's not even an insult. you would legitimately need to have no reading comprehension at all to read the description spelling out that yes, this precept is about free lovin' between everyone and anyone - and then confidently argue that no, this precept is not about free lovin' between everyone and anyone
turkler  [作者] 10 小时以前 
@Aristarchus of Samos you would have to be functionally illiterate to look read the name of a precept telling you 'Physical love is free and approved!' and then look at its description which is:
''The physical act of love is a noble thing, no matter who does it with whom.''

...emphasis on the 'no matter who does it with whom', and then think that the intention of the precept is about "pre-marital lovin', not free love in the sense of non-lover pawns engaging in lovin' "(sic)
Aristarchus of Samos 11 小时以前 
@turkler You're 100% right about the precept in vanilla; it lets them share beds freely, and it gives a mood boost to lovin'. But I cannot get non-lover colonists to engage in lovin'. I've never seen it myself and I just ran a devtest keeping pawns with good relations, bisexual, in bed for several days and never saw it happen. Physical Love: Free/Free and Approved are about pre-marital lovin , not free love in the sense of non-lover pawns engaging in lovin'. And I'm not against a free love precept, I think that's a great idea! But it's not how the precept works in vanilla.

I could be wrong; it's basically impossible to prove a negative, and I don't know how to dig into the code. I've just never seen non-lovers have lovin' outside of Intimacy.
turkler  [作者] 12 小时以前 
@Aristarchus of Samos no, they are vanilla. you can boot up the game with ideology right now and confirm it for you ourself, physical love: free and approved is a vanilla precept which gives +5 opinion for loving and lets pawns freely share beds. it's just not as prominent in the base game since lovin' can only happen in beds in vanilla. intimacy, in effect, simply removes the bed restriction
moreover, the descriptions are already tweaked to reflect any changes intimacy makes and the new precepts are explained pretty plainly. I don't know what more I could add besides 'WARNING!!! WARNING!!! FREE LOVIN' MEANS FREE LOVIN' BEWARE'' in all caps
Aristarchus of Samos 13 小时以前 
The reason people are getting unwanted interactions is because precept Physical Love: Free/Free and Approved is not vanilla. It is simply incorrect to state it's the same as vanilla in the mod description. In vanilla, pawns do not engage in sex with pawns who are not their lovers, and they get a debuff from sharing a bed with someone they're not the lover of. The whole point of the precept in vanilla is for lovers to share a bed/have lovin outside of marriage. The behavior is changed in Intimacy. At the very least the mod description should acknowledge this.
sashaeconomic 10 月 18 日 上午 10:20 
@turkler thanks. I am making a playset at the moment. Like your mod description. Hopefuly it will work with my other 200+ mods
turkler  [作者] 10 月 18 日 上午 9:44 
@sashaeconomic this mod is primarily maintained for the 1.6 version, yes. the mod also works in 1.5 but keep in mind that's an unmaintained version no longer receiving any updates, it's just there for the sake of not breaking things for 1.5 players who may not have migrated to 1.6 yet
sashaeconomic 10 月 18 日 上午 9:09 
work with 1.6? I read only about 1.5