安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Last time I checked, nothing should stop submodders from making all capital-class ships have persistent damage.
I have a planned submod for all ships with 70+ pop to have persistent damage. (mostly battlecruisers and battlecarriers.)
It's not quite all the T3 shipyard units you mention, but if every unit had persistent damage, it may drain credits quickly for players who take a few capital-class ships per fleet.
To note: the persistent damage script only occurs during player battles, meaning the player will lose more credits quicker compared to other factions. As with more units with persistent damage, the credit cost goes up, leading to smaller budgets.
(I may look into making it possible for persistent damage to occur during AI vs AI battles, reducing health by a certain random amount.)
If you want to see the current list of submods planned, join the EaWX submod Discord and check out my channel, where I have pinned this info.
Question, what would hypothetically stop a mod like this from applying to any large capital ships? Like anything that would be built by a tier 3 shipyard? That would make normal star destroyers also have persistent damage as well, generally reducing their widespread usability and providing a benefit to smaller frigates that wouldn't need repairs after every battle. Might be an interesting way to play