安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Last time I checked, nothing should stop submodders from making all capital-class ships have persistent damage.
I have a planned submod for all ships with 70+ pop to have persistent damage. (mostly battlecruisers and battlecarriers.)
It's not quite all the T3 shipyard units you mention, but if every unit had persistent damage, it may drain credits quickly for players who take a few capital-class ships per fleet.
To note: the persistent damage script only occurs during player battles, meaning the player will lose more credits quicker compared to other factions. As with more units with persistent damage, the credit cost goes up, leading to smaller budgets.
(I may look into making it possible for persistent damage to occur during AI vs AI battles, reducing health by a certain random amount.)
If you want to see the current list of submods planned, join the EaWX submod Discord and check out my channel, where I have pinned this info.
Question, what would hypothetically stop a mod like this from applying to any large capital ships? Like anything that would be built by a tier 3 shipyard? That would make normal star destroyers also have persistent damage as well, generally reducing their widespread usability and providing a benefit to smaller frigates that wouldn't need repairs after every battle. Might be an interesting way to play