安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Hmmm, looks like its not showing up anymore in the furnace if thats that case. I wonder with all the changes with frackin its not showing anymore?
Please note that cyberspace needs even more expansions then this,
And thank you
https://starbounder.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Modding%3ALiquids%3AMods&type=revision&diff=172197&oldid=171601
I've taken this up with patman already, but he claims it's not his problem since you didn't record your fluid id on the wiki.
Could you patch the fluid ID to something other than what patman's using?
Most are crafted via the workbench, but the liquid is smelted at the furnace.
http://starbounder.org/Cheap_Light
Well, that's not true at all, but the only idea i'm getting it's a bit... meh, at least as far as i'm able to imagine it. It would be a bit, displaying a 0 when it is off, and a lighted up 1 when turned on.
I guess I'll have to stick with cybertorches until some pops up with a really good idea.
I mean, I could add a simulation of a light, but it'd just be a glowing square probably. That wouldn't be interesting in-game at all!
Still, if you get any ideas, let me know. I may add it in!
My reasoning is that it's easier to imagine "melting" this data via heat than it is to craft it at a workbench!