安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






I chose them more for their role in Langobard history than the time period in which they existed. For instance, the Aztecs get the Jaguar as their replacement for a warrior. I gave them bronze swords for artistic purposes.
Swordsmen are also depicted in civ 5 as professional armored soldiers, not migratory warriors.
Please let me know if you figure out which mod was causing the conflict!
Details! Which DLCs are you missing? Try it without any other mods
Anch'io! Questo impero è il mio favorito
Hanno fatto 1200 anni fa! Si è conclusa a causa di Carlo Magno.
Nope. But Seige I does.
...
you got it
Also: if you use alternate leader selection, you can use two lombardy mods at one time. JFD has instructions for that on the mod page at civfanatics.
I can add some events & decisions at some point if you'd like. I was a little concerned about the sight myself, but it's fun and doesn't carry over to embarked sight.
Just planning/designing really, there were at least 3-4 other civs I wanted to do before the Lombards, it was just on my list is all.
Aw, sorry man. I hate it when that happens - were you in the planning stage or had you made any progress on it? I'm not opposed to a third unique in my civs.
Ah well, I have plenty of other civs on my list, really nice work here, interesting design, very high quality art, wonderful work!
Haha thanks soma