Cities: Skylines

Cities: Skylines

Perlan (Reykjavík, Iceland)
31 条留言
oldbox 2022 年 10 月 9 日 上午 6:30 
Just beautiful. Thank you:steamthumbsup:
btv 2021 年 1 月 10 日 下午 11:40 
brilliant :steamhappy:
Amazon Guard - Circular City 2019 年 10 月 15 日 下午 2:08 
beautiful architecture! thank you
OtterMom 2019 年 9 月 23 日 上午 4:46 
@trafficlight, try road anarchy
3Feathers 2018 年 10 月 24 日 下午 1:29 
þetta er mjög flott gaurinn min líkar við það ;)
trafficlight 2017 年 10 月 6 日 下午 1:49 
I can't seem to get this thing to connect to a road? Any suggestions?
MetroTrekker 2016 年 12 月 4 日 下午 12:15 
Ah this is the one they used for James Bond.
WalrusInAnus 2016 年 2 月 26 日 上午 12:00 
Still no update or at least a comment?
baronjutter 2015 年 10 月 26 日 下午 1:41 
Very nice looking but there seem to be some texturing issues, also I think you maybe used far too large textures as a building this size should really only be a couple mb in size. Would love to see this updated for AD and optimized.
Dispenser is spy 2015 年 10 月 17 日 上午 12:09 
After Dark?
WalrusInAnus 2015 年 10 月 16 日 上午 11:26 
Are you going to update this for After Dark?
DeaNoMeaN 2015 年 9 月 26 日 上午 2:02 
Hello.
Is there any chance to update it to the After Dark Espansion?
Thanks in advance :)
spokesyboi 2015 年 8 月 9 日 下午 9:11 
I visited Perlan back in March, watched an 'almost total' eclipse there. It's a bit of a climb up the hill (if walking) but worth it for the absolutely amazing views you get of Reykjavik!! (wish I was there now)
WalrusInAnus 2015 年 6 月 19 日 上午 8:49 
Very nice, but there seems to be some texture distortion on the edges of the top of the tanks. It might be related to shadows. Or maybe the texture is way too low resolution? I seem some strong jagginess all around the structure. Can you take a look please?
Dunderkrabban 2015 年 6 月 8 日 上午 7:40 
Gætirðu kannski græjað Hallgríms líka? ;)
Joe 2015 年 5 月 30 日 上午 10:34 
I've also been to the real Perlan and it's awesome.
Shaggyninja 2015 年 5 月 16 日 下午 11:14 
Someone died here and because it wasn't able to be connected to a road I couldn't get the dead person away. Kinda annoying.
xeluht 2015 年 5 月 14 日 上午 11:45 
I've visited real Perlan and this is very nice.
Hundur 2015 年 5 月 13 日 下午 2:15 
Takk kærlega fyrir að gera þetta. Ást frá selfossi :)
Baldvin 2015 年 5 月 13 日 上午 9:15 
æði, need more stuff from iceland in my city
Spectrumancer 2015 年 5 月 13 日 上午 9:06 
Frábært. Though I feel like it should have a tourist and entertainment rating as well ;)
D-B-9 2015 年 5 月 13 日 上午 2:39 
well
Bernd 2015 年 5 月 12 日 上午 10:31 
I am so happy to find something from Iceland. This Year i visited Iceland for the 1st Time, it was so great. Please more Stuff from Iceland. :D Tak :)
Hyfrith 2015 年 5 月 11 日 下午 1:35 
Went to the real Perlan when visiting Iceland in 2010, it gave a great view over the city :) I'll be adding this to my city too, for nostalgia's sake!
Goofus_Roofus 2015 年 5 月 10 日 下午 2:44 
I agree with Hvalreki, this is a perfect medium between the two options. Saying its OP because it has the equivalance of several instances of one of the other types is counter-intuitive to what it's purpose is. If you have the resources and the funding for it, and the demand is there, why not invest in an all in one super-structure that provides the services of multiple sources in one. Minimizing zoning requirments and still meeting the demand of the city. Though I feel the cost could be higher for it because it does so much, it still is a great option instead of wasting resources, space, and overall asthetics on a multitude of water towers and/or pump stations.
jaspinko  [作者] 2015 年 5 月 10 日 下午 2:42 
For those of you debating the cost of this asset, I've added a graphical analysis of the costs of water sources in the game . As the graph suggests, this asset is not over-powered; it is consistently more expensive than water pumps, yet becomes more cost effective compared to water towers as demand rises. This makes sense in a real world context: it would be cheaper to build one collection of water tanks in one go than to build six water tanks at different locations and different times.
Peanutcat 2015 年 5 月 10 日 上午 4:37 
I agree with blade.. IT feel quite op.
jaspinko  [作者] 2015 年 5 月 9 日 下午 8:01 
@BLÀde - I disagree. This asset produces 360,000 m³/week of water, which is the equivalent of 6 water towers or 3 water pumps in the game. The cost of the asset, $12,000, is the equivalent cost of 3.4 water towers (in which case the player saves money by building this instead of 6 water towers) or the cost of 4.8 water pumps (in which case the player is spending more money than they would for the equivalent capacity in pumps). To put it another way, the Perlan is 1.76 times more cost effective than water towers, but water pumps are yet 1.6 times more cost effective than the Perlan. Thus, the Perlan is a happy medium between water towers and water pumps - it is less expensive than 6 separate water structures, as would make sense in a real life scenario, but because it does not draw from flowing water, it still costs more than pumps for the same capacity.
BLÀde 2015 年 5 月 9 日 下午 7:01 
if it produces that much water it should cost more. right now it's pretty much a cheaty object.
Elias 2015 年 5 月 9 日 上午 4:58 
never heard of that building, but it's beautiful. my first thought was "why the f did he upload that building as a water & sewage building?". icelanders seem to have style ;)
wastel 2015 年 5 月 9 日 上午 2:13 
Just beautiful