安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






Anyway, not a complaint! Was just testing. Cool idea. Anything that creates more difficulty is good.
For example, in this case, if you are using my AI anti-cheat mod that removes faction potential and this one, which uses it to give random bonuses, only the one with higher priority in the load order will take effect.
In this case, if you use both mods and what you want is to remove the generic ones and apply these, this mod would need to have higher priority to apply its effects. To achieve this, if you are using the game's built-in mod manager, it should be placed lower in the list—for example, AI anti-cheat at position 1 and faction potential at position 2.
If you are using the Mod Manager tool, it should be the other way around—AI anti-cheat at 2 and faction potential at 1.
Thats cool