安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
however, i still dont understand the part of "Pawns with less than 50% Sight will eat up to 25% slower than pawns with more than 50% Sight." and "Non-blind pawns in Darkness will eat up to 50% slower." doesnt this mean darkness debuff on a sighted pawn is worse than a pawn who cant see at all?
https://psteamcommunity.yuanyoumao.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1750069106
* Shallower curve into darkness so 30% to 20% is 1.00 to 0.9 and then 20% to 0% is 0.9 to 0.5 drop off eating speed
* Global work speed maximum at 0% light is down to 0.25 (75% loss) instead of 0.20 (80% loss)
* Movement speed is 60% at 0% light
I'll have to play around more as I do have ways to help mitigate things (Aelanna's Flares mod) aside from the obvious of putting lights everywhere. Gut feeling is to leave it as-is as it does encourage gameplay aspects which you could otherwise just brute force or ignore.
I find myself lighting the paths I cut through the jungle so that they can get to where they need to go.
Also, playing Lilly's route first is a major regret of mine because there was no more motivation to even consider the other routes after that satisfaction.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dgvBfObKjas