安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






Basically everything but latewar 'bazookas' are on the table, if you were wondering about what's actually planned.
As for my preference, I don't care. Bayonets are stylish but I rarely use them, except for King_CreepaLot's mods where they have a good melee reach and better animations.
And as for my response, I'd consider instant switch and kill to be the bare minimum for a bayonet to even exist, so citing the bare non standards doesn't really help.
No ♥♥♥♥ it's personal preference. I am not your personal mod maid.
Kilavsky's "Carcano M91" weapon
the bayonet is an instant kill on hit and the fire-mode switch is basically immediate. it has been handy to me several times when suddenly in extreme close-quarters around corners, especially since Ravenfield bots don't to react to you instantly lol
you don't just run at an enemy with a bayonet. to cite that as a legitimate 'anti-fun' reason to hate bayonets on Ravenfield weapons is dishonest, and is either an intentional strawman, or a personal preference being phrased in the worst way possible
if we had access to the Resistance Sword's charge stab thing as modders, bayonets would be awesome. we don't, however, and as such bayonets are just like, anti-fun in my opinion. nowhere near worth the effort to make them.