安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
If you see errors, and can provide a log, I may be able to help.
@Doctor_Ido earth sprites will slowly make tiles into fertile soil
After getting Ideology the necromancers zombies have lost their ability to be sent off in a caravan on their own with the claim that you cant just send a "slave" alone,
They need a "non slave" to tag along to control them or some such error, Since the zombie isn't a living slave it should be able to be sent off like it was before Ideology...
System.MissingMethodException: Method not found: void Verse.GenExplosion.DoExplosion(...)
This occurs because the mod is still calling the old 1.5 signature of GenExplosion.DoExplosion, which no longer exists in RimWorld 1.6.
Thank you for the fast response!
Is it safe to just keep this one? Or is it only for RWoM?
Alternatively, if I use both, then does it decrease performance impact of Jecstools?
Thanks Dorito, I will look to implement that.
So seemingly the targeting issue with RWOM happens in the JecsTools method BeginTargetingWithVerb under the file Command_PawnAbility. Commenting out the line that sets the targeter's caster allowed casting a spell and shooting from a turret. After commenting out that line, I could cast a spell and the vehicle turret was still usable.
It seemed like caster arg was always null when I used a spell from RWOM anyhow. No clue if that's truly the case but it meant that commenting out that line had no negative effect on me
Regarding Hugslib, it appears RWoM only uses it for mod settings. Unfortunately, Hugslib functions are pretty solidly intertwined, it's not going to be trivial to spin just that functionality out. Consider it a solid "probably not". :)
Any plans on doing this as well with Hugslib ? i see some comments replying some FPS issues