武装突袭3

武装突袭3

Dire Partnership [Aegis] - [SP]
20 条留言
Garstrum 2024 年 9 月 13 日 下午 7:36 
Another fun one, short and sweet. about to play part 3
Avant-garde 2024 年 7 月 14 日 上午 9:24 
Nice!
Komodo 2024 年 6 月 29 日 下午 5:17 
another banger, ty C
HorgeTheFlier 2024 年 4 月 26 日 下午 12:16 
Beautiful mission as always. Everything went smoothly until the exfiltration when we were surrounded by enemies. Luckily we managed to exfiltrate anyway. It was very immersive.

And now, I want "King of Clubs"... :)
z4driver 2024 年 4 月 26 日 上午 11:44 
Nice mission. Thanks
Chris P. Bacon  [作者] 2024 年 4 月 25 日 下午 6:52 
@Kirgiz

Hey there, thanks for checking it out.

The fleeing HVT is a deliberate narrative choice but i can assure you, you'll definitely meet him again.

That "killing additional targets to prevent alarm" is a pretty good idea and i'll keep that in the chambers for something.

Thanks for playing:)
Kirgiz 2024 年 4 月 25 日 下午 3:16 
Yes This is great work!
And I think I know how the leader of the syndicate escaped. Apparently because you need to kill the leaders first and then be distracted by additional targets in order to prevent the alarm from being raised. Perhaps it is worth giving the player a choice of the order of tasks with the corresponding consequences for the development of events (then this will add replayability:steamhappy:).
But the mission is beautiful even now. For a one-time playthrough.:steamthumbsup:
[9RT]V®M®F® 2024 年 4 月 25 日 上午 6:21 
,:steamthumbsup:
Chris P. Bacon  [作者] 2024 年 4 月 24 日 上午 6:04 
@Zahl
Thanks dude, still waiting for what you cooking man :)

@holygeorge7
Thanks for checking, man. Really appreciate it :)
zahl 2024 年 4 月 23 日 上午 12:32 
Another really well made mission! Can't wait where the storyline leads next
holygeorge7 2024 年 4 月 22 日 上午 7:23 
Very nice, like always.
Chris P. Bacon  [作者] 2024 年 4 月 22 日 上午 6:36 
@Honger

Yup, It's probably because the "--independent units but on the OpFor side" thing. Haha my bad.

Should be fixed by now :)
honger 2024 年 4 月 22 日 上午 6:33 
units in the first checkpoint are displayed on the map as Independent (green), my units wouldn't shoot at them until I killed some of the enemies myself and even then they had to actually counter-fire to have the guys in my team "snap back" into actual fight. I assumed this is the case.
Chris P. Bacon  [作者] 2024 年 4 月 22 日 上午 6:23 
@honger

Hello, while the indep relation is unchanged, there are no indepent units in the scenario so i don't think it'll affect the mission. The separatist was made from independent units but they are on the Opfor side.

But i'll just change the relations quick just to be safe. Thanks for the input :)
honger 2024 年 4 月 22 日 上午 6:12 
I think you forgot to change side relations because Independents are friendly to BLUFOR and vice-versa.
onestar 2024 年 4 月 22 日 上午 4:23 
It is known
Chris P. Bacon  [作者] 2024 年 4 月 22 日 上午 4:22 
@onestar

Reject MX
Return to M4
onestar 2024 年 4 月 22 日 上午 4:12 
Solid mission once again! I'd say the only "flaw" is not related to your mission at all - it's the extensive service history of the m4a1 in this timeline (close to 50 years)...unkillable gun haha.
Chris P. Bacon  [作者] 2024 年 4 月 22 日 上午 3:09 
@Komodo
Thanks for checking it out man. Appreciate it :)
Komodo 2024 年 4 月 22 日 上午 3:05 
Another banger, ty C