安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
this is true, china deserves a lot more effort from paradox
First of all the cut off is 5 10 and -5, not 3 10 and -5 (it has a stickiness of 2)
secondly, Qing will basically never have legitimacy troubles so your second bonus is not that useful, and the legitimacy part of your proposed malus might as well not be there.
I like the concept of your 有教无类 proposal, however, since literacy (and thus education access) is tied to modernization (westernization) i am not sure that it fits thematically
Right now I'm mostly playing as Lanfang while keeping an eye on Qing to see if there is any behavior i'd like their IG traits to help manifest.
Changing the LO was obvious, because they are the most powerful Qing IG at game start, but had 3 traits that does absolutely nothing for/against Qing.(lol)
The next most powerful IG, the AF, already has a new set of traits given by paradox. So I don't need to worry about that.
So by all accounts the next IG i should be focusing on is the devout (Confucian Scholars/儒生). Though exactly how is still something i'm thinking about.