Victoria 3

Victoria 3

Enviromental Regulations
25 条留言
TahtsK9 10 月 5 日 下午 1:40 
Hi! I noticed that for some reason the various laws for some reason increases the home affairs institution instead of the environmental regulations institution, which leads to there still being a cap on the institution to 1.

A couple fixes for this are by replacing the home affairs lines with

country_institution_enviromental_regulations_max_investment_add = 2
to pollution tax
country_institution_enviromental_regulations_max_investment_add = 3
to enviromental standards
and country_institution_enviromental_regulations_max_investment_add = 4
to pollution management

in the /common/laws/00_enviromental_protections.txt file in the mod folder.

And a line of
country_institution_enviromental_regulations_max_investment_add = 1
in the /common/technology/technologies/99_er_society.txt file.
Jackkade  [作者] 9 月 29 日 下午 10:12 
It's now been updated!
Timoris 9 月 25 日 下午 6:36 
update please
田飞一马 9 月 20 日 上午 11:25 
This mod conflicts with laws+, can they be made compatible?
Jackkade  [作者] 7 月 29 日 下午 6:29 
Thanks for the info, I was out of town when that issue arrose and so couldnt fix it, but its been fixed now.
=(FGR)=Sentinel 7 月 20 日 下午 3:17 
Update for anyone who wants to correct the below: making the following addition to the mod's files allows the institution max level increases to work, but breaks the localization related to it. All you need to do is add a folder named modifier_type_definitions in common and then make a file in that (I named er_modifiers_types) with the following:
country_institution_enviromental_regulations_max_investment_add={
decimals=0
color=good
game_data={
ai_value=0
}
}
=(FGR)=Sentinel 7 月 20 日 下午 12:16 
So I noticed that you can only get one level of the environmental regulations institution in spite of the files saying that the Modern Sewage tech should increase it in the code. Picking around and comparing it to another mod that has working institutions it seems that the game expects that modifier to be defined in a separate file in modifier_type_definitions that isn't present for this mod. The mod where it works doesn't really indicate why this works, but it's the only difference I can actually see between the setup of the two mods.
牛奶大魔王 7 月 13 日 上午 11:18 
Greetings! What a great mod, I want more Chinese players used it so i have translated it inside V3 Chinese submod mod
Would u include a line in description?

Here is my Chinese localization.
https://psteamcommunity.yuanyoumao.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2880069248
Jackkade  [作者] 7 月 11 日 下午 9:23 
Hey Everybody! Its now fully compatible with 1.9.6!
_Sun_Man_ 6 月 22 日 上午 4:02 
update?
Brando-7 5 月 27 日 下午 10:56 
Really hope this gets an update with the new dlc coming out - i enjoy adding new laws like this!
UNSCSpartin 2024 年 12 月 5 日 下午 8:25 
so this mod dose not appear to be adding the laws to ideologies. anyone having a problem with this? I have checked the code as far as I can tell everything should be working
MidgetNinjaX 2024 年 8 月 25 日 下午 8:00 
Having the same issue as Forax, institution is capped at level one, and also... political parties don't seem interested in the law either way?
Forax91 2024 年 8 月 19 日 上午 10:20 
how to access more levels on institution? only got one level :S
AdamCF 2024 年 7 月 30 日 上午 12:45 
reasonable to make several laws mitigating pollution, comparing to those production methods improving. fun
Jackkade  [作者] 2024 年 7 月 23 日 下午 5:17 
Hello everyone! the mod has been updated to 1.7, additionally several more ideologies have opinions about the new laws, so it's no longer just industrialists vs rural folk. Healthcare pollution reduction has been reduced for balance reasons
DeluvianSenecca 2024 年 6 月 25 日 下午 5:50 
Please update
Forax91 2024 年 6 月 25 日 上午 3:37 
Hey. This needs a update for 1.7
Hemlow 2024 年 1 月 27 日 上午 8:49 
personally I think regulations should include throughput penalties or introduce base production costs to limit effectiveness of regulated industries
Nezerathian 2024 年 1 月 26 日 上午 11:38 
so... how the repar going;)?
Forax91 2023 年 11 月 16 日 下午 3:30 
okey, thx for fast reply :)
Jackkade  [作者] 2023 年 11 月 16 日 上午 11:26 
yeah, I think it got broke with the new update, ill fix it soon
Forax91 2023 年 11 月 16 日 上午 11:01 
Hey. I dont get the trait on the farmers or the industrialist :S
SpaghettiMan 2023 年 10 月 30 日 下午 6:55 
There's literally a tax option lmao
Average Ligurian 2023 年 10 月 30 日 下午 4:03 
Good idea but Pigou would say that a tax would be more efficient than regulations: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigouvian_tax