安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






Thank you!
但上个版本,1.7时还好好的,可以兼容
icon = "gfx/interface/icons/ideology_icons/unused/royalist.dds"
ideology_english_patriotic: 中文版没有的遗留词条
ideology_france_bonapartist: 中文版没有的遗留词条
ideology_free_speech: 未编写
ideology_isolationist_landowners: 未编写
ideology_shia_moralist_desc: “sunni”应作“shia”
ig_nomads: 未编写
ideology_isolationist_nomad: 未编写
ideology_agrarian_nomad: 未编写
ideology_agrarian_russian: 未编写
另外我注意到很多英文文本是以过去时态编写的,以原版为基准的话应采用一般现在时态。
祝你创作愉快!
That is true, however in Europe too it was accepted that a women can inherit and can own things. Since the christian churches heavely influenced the implementation of this kind of laws it is safe to say, that both Islam and Christianity should have propertied women as default view on womens rights. And the protestant christians were and still are very much ahead of the muslims and catholics, since they allowed female priests after the end of the Games timeframe and were/are therefore much more open to women than all the other abrahamic religions. This should be represented by giving the protestants a more progressive opinion about womens rights.
I will modify all landowners in the Americas to favor free trade (because of their plantation economy stance)