Stellaris

Stellaris

More Overlord Holdings
60 条留言
jojobe 2024 年 5 月 8 日 下午 10:43 
I hope it gets an update i liked this mod.
kolokommouna 2024 年 1 月 27 日 下午 12:56 
update?
Roseru  [作者] 2023 年 6 月 15 日 上午 4:43 
Because the may be outdated. Aka newest patch ruined the mod.
Perambulante in tenebr 2023 年 6 月 15 日 上午 3:12 
it's strange that it doesn't work?
AlphaAsh 2023 年 5 月 29 日 上午 8:36 
Appreciated.
Roseru  [作者] 2023 年 5 月 29 日 上午 8:34 
@AlphaAsh I've added UIOD as Required Item
AlphaAsh 2023 年 5 月 29 日 上午 8:32 
Nice. I don't use UIOD myself, but glad to read that Orrie got it working.
Roseru  [作者] 2023 年 5 月 29 日 上午 8:31 
@AlphaAsh The scroll bar appears in the agreements tab when you have UI Overhaul Dynamic installed, it does not appear at the planet screen. I suppose some tweaks could add it but I am not skilled in UI modding.
AlphaAsh 2023 年 5 月 29 日 上午 8:15 
"In Case of the planet limit of branch offices situation is the same, you change their limit in 00_defines but you also have to change the checks for how many you can build because it depends on planet population or some other thing. It probably is in the common folder."

It's a modifier given by capital buildings.
AlphaAsh 2023 年 5 月 29 日 上午 8:13 
@Roseru Your thumb does show a scrollbar. If all you've done is changed the defines for holdings, then that addition to the UI isn't native to your mod. The modding of the UI I've done there myself, I couldn't get a scrollbar working either, and I instead increased the size of the window.
barkingnoise 2023 年 5 月 29 日 上午 7:52 
@Roseru I would suggest just blocking this Darth-person, they seem to be insulted over a misunderstanding.
Roseru  [作者] 2023 年 5 月 29 日 上午 6:28 
@Darth Tiredlass I never claimed anything about UI Modding just about the empire wide supposedly hardcoded holding limit. You can build up to 8 holdings on all planets combined with this mod.
Darth Tiredlass 2023 年 5 月 29 日 上午 2:49 
Also, just in case you were still inexplicably caught up in thinking you're the only person in the world who knows about the defines file - check some of UIOD's submods. I find it very hard to believe that, while Orrie was modding the defines file, he somehow wasn't aware of the existence of the defines file.

Seriously. These completely baseless insults and assertions are incredibly easy to disprove, and I truly cannot understand why you choose to behave this way and believe these assumptions.
Darth Tiredlass 2023 年 5 月 29 日 上午 2:30 
So the description is, indeed, a lie then.

Between:
- Having a description that is undeniably false and misleading
- Your insults towards Orrie
- Pretending that modding the holdings UI is as simple as editing the defines file which anyone with entry-level modding experience knows is completely false
- Claiming that anyone who acknowledges the simple fact that some things are indeed hardcoded is a lazy idiot, which includes the PDX devs themselves

Your behaviour and conduct are shameful, and you should definitely reflect on the statements of fact you have made that are disgraceful or extremely easily disproven.
Roseru  [作者] 2023 年 5 月 29 日 上午 2:23 
@Darth Tiredlass The planet screen won't support more than 4 holdings but you can still build them from agreements menu and you can build holdings on other planets.
Roseru  [作者] 2023 年 5 月 29 日 上午 2:22 
Sorry for my initial rage, I am sure UIOD developer is a smart person, UI modding is hard he just assumed it was hardcoded because he had no idea about holdings limit in 00_defines.txt
Darth Tiredlass 2023 年 5 月 29 日 上午 2:22 
Altering the defines file does not alter the holdings UI. This is a very simple fact, and your strange insistence that it is not, and that nothing is hardcoded - something that is also just blatantly untrue, unless you know better than the PDX staff themselves on the issue - leaves very little confidence.
Roseru  [作者] 2023 年 5 月 29 日 上午 2:16 
If someone says (In case of Paradox games except PA): "It is hardcoded, can't modifiy" translate it to "I have no clue how I can modify it."
Roseru  [作者] 2023 年 5 月 29 日 上午 2:15 
In Case of the planet limit of branch offices situation is the same, you change their limit in 00_defines but you also have to change the checks for how many you can build because it depends on planet population or some other thing. It probably is in the common folder.
Roseru  [作者] 2023 年 5 月 29 日 上午 2:14 
Somethings are just not in places where you would expect them to be. It is the case with some graphics with are in weird folders or for certain functions or defines which you have to find. For example not all possible modifiers are listed on the wiki and sometimes you have to find the proper syntax in the game itself. Holdings limit is in defines and it has to be increased in order to make mods like mine. if someting doesn't work check 00_defines and make necessary changes. I am tired of modders saying something is hardcoded. Even DLC things can be changed if you just dig in the DLC files.
Roseru  [作者] 2023 年 5 月 29 日 上午 2:08 
The mod works I tested it, the author of UIOD is just a fucking idiot.
Roseru  [作者] 2023 年 5 月 29 日 上午 2:08 
@Darth Tiredlass It works, NOTHING I repeat NOTHING IS HARD CODED in Paradox Titles except for Prison Architect. You just have to change the max number of holdings allowed in defines file or create your own defines file as I did. If someone says "YoU cAn'T dO iT, hArDcOdEd!1!!11!" it is just an excuse that they don't know how to do it.
Darth Tiredlass 2023 年 5 月 29 日 上午 2:05 
Is the description accurate? To my knowledge, the author of UIOD has been unable to change the overlord or branch office holding slots above 4 due to hardcoded limitations.
Roseru  [作者] 2023 年 5 月 28 日 下午 10:53 
@Dragon of Desire Thank you for your patience and sorry for my slowness
Dragon of Desire 2023 年 5 月 25 日 下午 12:20 
That sounds great!
Roseru  [作者] 2023 年 5 月 25 日 上午 10:07 
@Dragon of Desire, not a problem unless Dynamic UI glitches. I can also make it that there are only four options in the contract 4, 8, 12 ne 16 that could work too
Dragon of Desire 2023 年 5 月 24 日 上午 10:27 
When you update, could you also do a version that adds 16?
Roseru  [作者] 2023 年 5 月 24 日 上午 9:06 
@Dragon of Desire If I forgot to update it you can keep reminding, I am subscribed to teh tread so I will get notified.
Dragon of Desire 2023 年 5 月 24 日 上午 8:45 
Alright. Hope to see it updated soon, there's really no other mod doing this.
Roseru  [作者] 2023 年 5 月 24 日 上午 1:25 
I am away from my PC for around a week. Untill then I can't physically update the mod.
Dragon of Desire 2023 年 5 月 23 日 下午 10:58 
Any ETA on the update?
ZacharyBuilder 2023 年 5 月 18 日 下午 1:15 
Thanks
Roseru  [作者] 2023 年 5 月 17 日 下午 9:57 
@ZacharyBuilder Is comming
ZacharyBuilder 2023 年 5 月 17 日 下午 5:46 
3,8 update?
Roseru  [作者] 2023 年 4 月 18 日 上午 8:29 
@Juhn
Will AI vassalize you up to 8 holdings? No idea.
Is it possible to vassalize AI up to 8 holdings in normal gameplay? Yes, I changed loyalty and agreeableness values exactly for that.
However if you feel like something works not as intended or you just feel like anything needs a change, tell me.
Juhn 2023 年 4 月 18 日 上午 8:15 
Will the AI actually do contracts up to 8 holdings???
Perambulante in tenebr 2023 年 4 月 6 日 上午 4:11 
try it , as they say , trying is not torture.
Roseru  [作者] 2023 年 4 月 6 日 上午 3:33 
Maybe it would make enough space for more corporate holdings.
Roseru  [作者] 2023 年 4 月 6 日 上午 3:33 
Roseru  [作者] 2023 年 4 月 6 日 上午 3:31 
@Eressea De Haran UI modding is hard I tried it and wasted like 8 hours of my life just to get a broken scroll bar and nothing useful.
Perambulante in tenebr 2023 年 4 月 6 日 上午 2:48 
and so it turns out that only the interface does not work?
Perambulante in tenebr 2023 年 4 月 6 日 上午 2:47 
well, now, at least, it is clear why such mods do not exist... what a pity...
Roseru  [作者] 2023 年 4 月 6 日 上午 12:05 
@Eressea de Haran, Megcorp can have 4 offices per planet. Players have at least 3 planets usually which gives you total of 12 btanch offices. Modifying mumber of holdings per planet would make it so I would have to modify the UI myself. I have no idea how to mod UI. If dynamic Overhaul won't fix it for me, nothing will.
Perambulante in tenebr 2023 年 4 月 5 日 下午 12:45 
it's just that a megacorporation would have at least 8 buildings-it would be nice in branches.
Roseru  [作者] 2023 年 4 月 5 日 上午 5:37 
@Eressea De Haran I will try however I can't promise I will make it since I am not a very skilled modder.
Perambulante in tenebr 2023 年 4 月 5 日 上午 5:25 
yes,sir
Roseru  [作者] 2023 年 4 月 5 日 上午 5:11 
@Eressea De Haran In which way? Add more holdings per planet?
Roseru  [作者] 2023 年 4 月 5 日 上午 5:10 
@Lazy Invincible General I am not capable of modding such a thing. Sorry, I just lack skill.
Perambulante in tenebr 2023 年 4 月 5 日 上午 4:59 
and can it be the same for branches?)
Roseru  [作者] 2023 年 4 月 5 日 上午 1:06 
@Rohzdear Yes