安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






@Certified Freak the missile can only aim 90° in both directions, if the target is behiend you, you need to turn the vehicle
@Benjhew thanks, i need to test it again, sometimes updates break a lot of things without any reason
@JCweirdo the R-17 was just the base version, there are plenty of them R-17M, R-17MU, R-17W.... the SM-2 missile can attack targets up to 33km, the R-17 flies at a maximum of 35km and due to the cruise height and the lack of oxygen on this altitude, the R-17 is wobbling a lot, making it hard to counteract with missiles.
2. The thing can hardly make it over the black sea. Wouldn't land very close to
America.
3. A SM-2 could counter the missile, The sm-2 is on the weaker end and is
designed to take down aircraft, not missiles.
Our president shows weakness, and countries that show weakness are usually more vulnerable.