Victoria 3

Victoria 3

Formable Nations: Plus | 1.11 compatible
325 条留言
Mordock  [作者] 10 月 26 日 下午 1:01 
@FeebleBurrito80, that is indeed a bug. Thanks for letting me know. I'll work on fixing it
Feebleburrito80 10 月 26 日 下午 12:44 
i don't know if it is on purpose but before i formed the roman empire i had maghrebi as a primary culture due to that journal decision but when i formed the roman empire i lost it as a primary culture. it may be a bug but i do not know.
Mr.Wolf ♔ 10 月 24 日 下午 7:49 
I recommend making the Incan Empire an hegemony instead of an empire, not just because historically that's what that empire was, but also because once you form Peru-Bolivia you CANNOT form the Incan Empire because both of those states are empire tier, meaning you can only form one empire

Also, can you rename the Incan Empire to Tawantinsuyu? That was the official name historically
Levin 10 月 24 日 上午 9:46 
the dlc list in the main menu is buggy and floats between "load game" and "host game". For some reason, the mod also counts as a dlc in this list.
hhoras214 10 月 18 日 下午 12:39 
update to 1.11 please
sokotofalcon 10 月 7 日 上午 10:54 
for the next update, can you make it so that forming the Caliphate also automatically gives you the Caliphate government currently limited only to Sokoto?
BigMitchUSA 10 月 3 日 上午 7:53 
Latest update seems to have broken mod again - thanks paradox
Anubis 10 月 1 日 下午 1:55 
I agree with @Freglz that it would be interesting to have some more African formable nations.

It is good that Songhai was added in the west but the Eastern and Southern parts of Africa could use something else (especially the Zulu).


Also - is there an updated list of available formables anywhere? The on on the discussions seems to be missing the more recent additions.
HydroGammer 9 月 25 日 上午 2:38 
I think the Imperial federation should have a similar decision making to the USE and/or Roman Empire.
Genuess 9 月 16 日 上午 6:51 
Hello can we have CSA(Give ability to form the nation to states like Texas) and Pacific states of america formable?
Dnaks 9 月 8 日 下午 9:23 
Hello, can we have a Maphilindo formable?
Mordock  [作者] 9 月 7 日 上午 12:16 
@Nxt1yr, I assume you're looking at the decision to form the USE. If you have decided to pursue the USE via diplomatic means you'll have a journal entry called "Forming the USE: Diplomatic". There you have a journal button with all the requirements.
You're doing good, but for example you also need Norway, Sweden, Denmark and portugal as puppets and you're going to need some land off Austria as well. I hope this helps but let me know if something is unclear
Nxt1yr 9 月 6 日 下午 1:59 
How do i form USE? im playing as prussia and i have the netherlands, belgium, switzerland, france and sadinia-piedmont as my subjects but the decision is greyed out? The tooltip says "The country has the variable in question" and i have no idea what that means
Freglz 9 月 5 日 下午 3:19 
One final suggestion I have is to add more formables for Africa, at least until colonial-target countries actually receive some depth and content. I feel cheated that when I actually do well as, say, Zulu, there's nothing unique about the country, even some region-specific flavour. I'd love to be able to either form a higher tier of nation with benefits in recognition of the accomplishment (besides, they were often KINGDOMS to begin with, not principalities), and determine what its immediate future should hold -- stabalise relations with the greater powers and improve trade, or seek to conquer or unify Africa further with claims on adjacent territories and such.

Personally, a native-led South African empire would be fun, with a branching decision to either expel, integrate or accept the foreign settlers. Maybe that means they're a primary culture, or maybe it means a significant reduction in radicalism for discriminated pops.
Freglz 9 月 5 日 下午 3:12 
@Mordock, another idea I have is to limit potential journal bloat by locking formable countries' journal entries behind relevant conditions, or making them a one-time triggered event the play can choose to pursue or not.

For instance, as Great Britain, having a subject or owning a state in the Scandinavian region triggers the option to pursue forming the North Sea Empire. Similarly, after either researching pan-nationalism or a set in-game period, the event to pursue forming the Imperial Federation is triggered -- inspired by real or alt-history calls for all territories to be brought together.

I typically have a goal in mind when I play a nation, anyway, and find other options in the meantime to be distracting.

By the way, there are two formable Oceanias, one I'm assuming came with the base game and another with your mod. I don't know if you meant to edit the vanilla one or if they're somehow an outdated artefact.
Acidrotaticam 8 月 31 日 上午 10:25 
I would love if you add more formables in Latin America, like, League of the free peoples for Uruguay, United states of rio de la plata and Gran Colombia are mandatory!, not sure about what could be added for Chile but i can guess it can have pretty good formables too
Apo7292009 8 月 30 日 下午 2:44 
by conflict, i mean duplicate nations with same name where both have different culture and land goals and flag.
Apo7292009 8 月 30 日 下午 2:42 
are you planning on adding nations from kikko's formable nations and hinderson's countries and african formables? I would love to have most formable/releasable nations but these three mod conflinct with each other and with yours.
Mordock  [作者] 8 月 29 日 下午 11:51 
@Freglz, that's actually a good idea. I'll add that in the next update!
Mordock  [作者] 8 月 29 日 下午 11:49 
@Lasqa, You could make your own mod and I could add it to the description if people would like to download it
Freglz 8 月 29 日 下午 6:41 
It would be nice if the journal entries for each formable nation also included the bonuses you would receive for forming those nations. I hope that comes in a future update.
Lasqa 8 月 19 日 上午 6:49 
The original mod has a very tongue-tied and incorrect translation into Russian, it's really painful to read. I'm making a corrected version, is there any chance you could add a link to it in the description? Or maybe include my translation in the original mod?
kakarotmm12 8 月 18 日 下午 2:53 
Is this compatible with More Beautiful states? If not, can someone make a patch?
Imperial Stormtrooper 8 月 17 日 上午 3:28 
Will the Western Roman empire be added as a formable?
Horus 8 月 15 日 下午 4:11 
Empire of America all of south central and north america would be good
FreeLancer8A [UA] 8 月 15 日 上午 8:07 
Finno-Ugria should be updated to include Karelian and Estonian as primary cultures
Nikvadro #Tradeit 8 月 12 日 上午 9:56 
Finish 8 月 12 日 上午 6:52 
Can you add an option to set whether AI can establish a mod country, play the Soviet Union wants to help Cuba establish a Caribbean Union
Mordock  [作者] 8 月 10 日 上午 10:17 
@Finish Correct, that's intended
Finish 8 月 8 日 上午 1:32 
AI will not establish mod countries
YepThatsMyName 8 月 6 日 上午 10:07 
Unite everything under the watchful eye of the Big Brother
Melting 8 月 6 日 上午 9:40 
for united north america, i get you have greater america and greater canada, but im thinking an even larger one. like 'Canadian north american dominion' or 'United States of North America' requiring the entire continent instead of partial. Grande patria is kinda unified south america to be honest though so you right about that.
Imperial Stormtrooper 8 月 6 日 上午 4:29 
I have a few different suggestions:
Greater Romania/Bulgaria
Greater Italy
Greater Germany
derpiestderp :3 8 月 6 日 上午 1:24 
fair enough, its strong enough as is lmao
Mordock  [作者] 8 月 5 日 下午 11:52 
@derpiestderp :3 while I understand it might be frustrating to not be able to puppet majors, I'm simply afraid it might become a bit too OP to puppet all of Europe to easily.
Mordock  [作者] 8 月 5 日 下午 11:37 
@Melting United South America already exists, and United North America sort off(Greater America), but puppet names based off the overlord would be diffucult. I'll have a look but no promises.
derpiestderp :3 8 月 5 日 下午 11:25 
could you perhaps change it so diplomatic puppeting for say the United europe journal entry only requires you to be a higher rank than the target nation?
Either way a cool mod!
Melting 8 月 5 日 下午 9:56 
united africa, united south america, united north america, expanded puppet names too would be interesting, for instance use the language of that nation for their puppet names
Mordock  [作者] 8 月 3 日 下午 11:14 
@Mr.Wolf Ah, apologies, that's how you meant it. Yes, you can form the Inca Empire as Peru-Bolivia
Mr.Wolf ♔ 8 月 3 日 下午 1:22 
No...we literally discussed how you couldn't do that before, because both Peru-Bolivia and Inca were classified as empires then it meant you could only form one of them, which sucked because forming Peru-Bolivia is necessary if you want to mantain both of the countries united

Did you fix it?
Mordock  [作者] 8 月 2 日 下午 10:58 
@Mr.Wolf correct, they were always able to. When you form it you get the choice to change primary culture to native South American ones.
Mr.Wolf ♔ 8 月 2 日 下午 5:07 
Soooo, can you form the Inca Empire with Peru-Bolivia now?
YepThatsMyName 7 月 31 日 上午 11:27 
I don't know if it'd fit the mod, but since ya said you were looking for interesting country ideas. . .

What about Stanistan? Basically if every country ending with -stan united.

So it'd be a nation that can be formed by any country in the territories of Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Turkemistan, Kyrgyzstan Afghanistan and Pakistan. And can have journal entries to also take in India (Hindustan) and Kurdistan territories (while also taking in Persia since it's in the way there and includes some -stans too), and to claim territories in Russia (Bashkortostan, Dagestan and Tatarstan)
Mr.Wolf ♔ 7 月 30 日 下午 8:24 
@Smile i think the Timurid Empire is more for Uzbekistan than Persia
Tsar 7 月 29 日 下午 2:11 
Great mod. Why doesn't forming oceania mean I need to annex the colonies? Shouldn't it be unification play?
Smile 7 月 26 日 上午 5:05 
you're dutch, and your idea of a formable for Iran is the timurid empire of all things?

CLARIFICATION :
Timurid empire, was named that, because it was founded by Timur, A monghol-Turkic emperor, an empire claiming legitimacy from the Monghols, a dynasty that didn't exist anymore btw

Persia, 1836, is ruled by a turkMENIC descent dynasty (qajars), claiming legitimacy from age-old Persian myth kingdoms (Kiyanians)

if you're going to go full LARP, pick something that people care about (like you did with macedonia greece) such as Achemenids, Sassanids etc

if you want it to make plausible sense (which is my only guess as of why you'd go for this as it was more recent i guess?) go for something that makes sense for the nation as a whole

whether it be the Qajar dynasty, a theocratic republic, or a republic, this nation did not care for much for Timur bro, why would it want to recreate it?
#無蝴蝶結的彩虹叫雨# 7 月 24 日 下午 11:02 
Thanks for "Big brother" version update, I can form amazing 1984 countries finally.:tup:
🦈Lily🦈 7 月 24 日 上午 3:05 
How about a (Greater) Burgundy tag? Burgundy exists as a name/colour/flag switch for an Autocratic Monarchy United Netherlands, but I'd love to be able to claim French Burgundian lands and also retain the flavour while also being a Burgundian Republic
Mordock  [作者] 7 月 22 日 上午 8:45 
@Dewdrop @Archscientist K, I'll have a look at you guy's suggestion after the next update since it won't make that one. Thanks for the feedback!
Archscientist K 7 月 21 日 下午 6:47 
Love this mod for adding goals to my playthroughs!

While playing Brazil and forming Greater Brazil, I noticed the decision to form United South America requires the Guyana state. Geographically, that makes sense, but it feels off as a hard requirement. Guyana is more culturally and demographically Caribbean than South American (as seen in-game by its homelands).

From a gameplay standpoint, it ends up feeling like an "annoying last chore" since it forces conflict with France, the Dutch, and Britain—without giving you claims, unlike the rest of South America when forming Greater Brazil.

My suggestion: drop Guyana as a hard requirement (it's already optional for Greater Brazil) and instead make it a decision you can take after forming United South America. That way, you could claim or diplomatically acquire it—with infamy and relation penalties—justified by geography.